īy Kant's account, when we employ a concept of some type to describe or categorize noumena (the objects of inquiry, investigation or analysis of the workings of the world), we are in fact merely employing a way of describing or categorizing phenomena (the observable manifestations of those objects of inquiry, investigation or analysis). As expressed in Kant's Critique of Pure Reason, human understanding is structured by "concepts of the understanding", or innate categories that the mind uses in order to make sense of raw unstructured experience. The two words serve as interrelated technical terms in Kant's philosophy. Noumenon (Kant used the term "Ding an sich", or "thing-in-itself") is distinguished from phenomenon ("Erscheinung"), the latter being an observable event or physical manifestation capable of being observed by one or more of the five human senses. The etymology of the word derives from the Greek nooúmenon (thought-of) and ultimately reflects nous (mind). Noumenon came into its modern usage through Immanuel Kant. Noumenon is linguistically unrelated to " numinous," a term coined by Rudolf Otto and based on the Latin numen (deity). "Noumenon" is the neuter form of the present passive participle of Greek "νοείν (noein)", which in turn originates from " nous" (roughly, "mind"). the Absolute, the totality of things all that is, whether it has been discovered or not.įor instance, the philosopher Immanuel Kant used the term noumenon synonymously with the phrase thing in itself ( German: Ding an sich.Thing-in-itself, an actual object and its properties independent of any observer.Roughly, a noumenon may be distinguished from the following concepts, although it has been argued they are actually synonymous: It may be further contrasted with the perception and processing of a phenomenon in the human mind. Noumena are objects or events known only to the imagination - independent of the senses. A phenomenon can be an exceptional, unusual, or abnormal thing or event - but it must be perceptible through the senses A noumenon cannot be the actual object that emits the phenomenon in question. The term is generally used in contrast with, or in relation to, " phenomenon" (plural: phenomena), which refers to appearances, or objects of the senses. The philosophical position that rejects all but the observable phenomenon of objects is called Positivism. As a concept it has much in common with objectivity. It classically refers to an object of human inquiry, understanding or cognition. The noumenon (plural: noumena) is a posited object or event as it is in itself, independent of the senses. Please help to improve this page yourself if you can. This article needs rewriting to enhance its relevance to psychologists.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |